The Boston Tea party is both an act of vandalism and activism because the colonists were attempting to take action in opposition to the British taxes, yet they chose to deliberately destroy property in the process.
Contents
What damage did the Boston Tea Party cause?
The damage the Sons of Liberty caused by destroying 340 chests of tea, in today’s money, was worth more than $1,700,000 dollars. The British East India Company reported £9,659 worth of damage caused by the Boston Tea Party. According to some modern estimates, the destroyed tea could have brewed 18,523,000 cups of tea!
Was the Boston Tea Party a riot?
It Was a Riot. We do not care for the revolutionary spirit to survive the revolution. The revolution, however, goes nowhere without it.
Was the Boston Tea Party justified why or why not?
To state whether the Boston Tea Party was justified or not is a subjective question. It is important to note, however, that the common theme surrounding this critical point in American history is that it indeed was justified because it was a step in the direction of independence.
Who destroyed the Boston Tea Party?
the Sons of Liberty
340 chests of British East India Company Tea, weighing over 92,000 pounds (roughly 46 tons), onboard the Beaver, Dartmouth, and Eleanor were smashed open by the Sons of Liberty armed with an assortment of axes and dumped into Boston Harbor the night of December 16, 1773.
Was the Boston Tea Party activism or vandalism?
The Boston Tea party is both an act of vandalism and activism because the colonists were attempting to take action in opposition to the British taxes, yet they chose to deliberately destroy property in the process.
Was the Boston Tea Party an act of civil disobedience?
According to this definition, the Boston Tea Party was not civil disobedience because of the destruction of property.
How did the Boston Tea Party End?
Coercive Acts
But despite the lack of violence, the Boston Tea Party didn’t go unanswered by King George III and British Parliament. In retribution, they passed the Coercive Acts (later known as the Intolerable Acts) which: closed Boston Harbor until the tea lost in the Boston Tea Party was paid for.
What are 5 facts about the Boston Tea Party?
7 Surprising Facts About the Boston Tea Party
- Colonists weren’t protesting a higher tax on tea.
- The attacked ships were American and the tea wasn’t the King’s.
- The tea was Chinese, not Indian, and lots of it was green.
- The Tea Party, itself, didn’t incite revolution.
- 10 Things You May Not Know About the Boston Tea Party.
What was the British response to the Boston Tea Party?
The Boston Tea Party caused considerable property damage and infuriated the British government. Parliament responded with the Coercive Acts of 1774, which colonists came to call the Intolerable Acts.
What were the causes and effects of the Boston Tea Party?
The cause of the Boston Tea Party was the colonists didn’t want taxed tea. The effect was the Sons of Liberty dressed up as Mohawk Indians and dumped all the tea of three ships when they brought a new supply to the colonists.
Did the Boston Massacre lead to the Boston Tea Party?
The Boston Tea Party and Massacre, Two Acts Leading to the American Revolution. The Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre were two events that inspired the American Revolution, which later led to the independence of the thirteen colonies. December 16, 1773, nine o’clock at night.
Why did the Tea Act anger the colonists?
The 1773 Act gave the British East India Company a monopoly on British Tea, so it had control over all tea sold in the colonies. Even though the price of tea was lowered, the colonists were angry because they were forced to buy only British East India Company’s tea and no longer could buy any tea they wanted.
Was there violence during the Boston Tea Party?
Boston Tea Party Violence. No one died during the Boston Tea Party. There was no violence and no confrontation between the Patriots, the Tories and the British soldiers garrisoned in Boston. No members of the crews of the Beaver, Dartmouth, or Eleanor were harmed.
Why did the British do nothing to stop the destruction of the tea?
If the tea wasn’t unloaded, customs weren’t paid. And if the ships tried to sail back out of port, Montagu would stop them and charge them with failing to pay customs on their cargo that was due, according to him, because they had already entered port.
What was thrown overboard at the Boston Tea Party?
Boston Tea Party, (December 16, 1773), incident in which 342 chests of tea belonging to the British East India Company were thrown from ships into Boston Harbor by American patriots disguised as Mohawk Indians.
Was destroying the tea a big deal?
Samuel Adams did later say that it was the act of people defending their rights and not the act of an angry mob. It was just tea, what’s the big deal? It actually was a lot of tea. The 342 containers totaled 90,000 pounds of tea!
What are some examples of vandalism?
Definition of Vandalism
- Spray painting another’s property with the purpose of defacing;
- “Egging” someone’s car or house;
- Keying (or scratching) paint off of someone’s car;
- Breaking someone’s windows;
- Defacing public property with graffiti and other forms of “art”;
- Slashing someone’s tires;
- Defacing park benches;
Was Great Britain’s response to the Boston Tea Party justified?
Great Britain reacted very strongly to the Boston Tea Party. When the colonists dumped the tea in the harbor at Boston, the British East India Company lost a significant amount of money. To punish the colonies, especially those in Massachusetts, for this action, the British passed the Intolerable Acts.
Why was the Boston Tea Party an example of civil disobedience?
Non-violent acts of civil disobedience started the U.S. quest for independence from Great Britain, though they eventually gave way to acts of increasing violence.The Boston Tea Party overstepped the limit of non-violence through its deliberate destruction of property.
Who was Paul Revere warning?
On this night in 1775, Paul Revere was instructed by the Sons of Liberty to ride to Lexington, Mass., to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them.
