The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists’ desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.
Contents
What happened as a result of the Boston Massacre?
The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars.
What was the result of the Boston Massacre quizlet?
What was the outcome of the Boston Massacre? More fights broke out in Boston. The colonists became even more angry and determined to be free from British rule.It was the first conflict between British soldiers and colonists where colonists were killed by the soldiers.
Why did the Boston Massacre happen and what was one result?
Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a British loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.
What happened after the Stamp Act?
After months of protest, and an appeal by Benjamin Franklin before the British House of Commons, Parliament voted to repeal the Stamp Act in March 1766. However, the same day, Parliament passed the Declaratory Acts, asserting that the British government had free and total legislative power over the colonies.
What verdict did the jury in the Boston Massacre case make as a result of the evidence presented in court why did they make that decision *?
The jury acquitted six of the soldiers: William Wemms, William M’Cauley, Hugh White, William Warren, John Carrol and James Hartegan. The other two soldiers, Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Killroy, were found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter, therefore escaping the death penalty.
Who yelled fire in the Boston Massacre?
Private Hugh Montgomery was the first British soldier to fire in the Boston Massacre. According to many historic documents, he was also identified by many witnesses in the trial as the man who killed Crispus Attucks.
What started the Boston Massacre?
The Boston Massacre began the evening of March 5, 1770 with a small argument between British Private Hugh White and a few colonists outside the Custom House in Boston on King Street. The argument began to escalate as more colonists gathered and began to harass and throw sticks and snowballs at Private White.
Who is to blame for the Boston Massacre?
Patriots argued the event was the massacre of civilians perpetrated by the British Army, while loyalists argued that it was an unfortunate accident, the result of self-defense of the British soldiers from a threatening and dangerous mob.
What was one of the outcomes of the Stamp Act?
The most significant outcome of the resistance to the Stamp Act was that it allowed the colonist to get organized in opposition groups. Merchants implemented a non importation agreement boycotting all British goods.
What were the effects of the Stamp Act?
They raised the issue of taxation without representation, and formed societies throughout the colonies to rally against the British government and nobles who sought to exploit the colonies as a source of revenue and raw materials.
Why was the Boston Massacre important to the American Revolution?
The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists’ desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.
What does the outcome verdict of the trial tell us about colonial juries and justice in the 13 colonies?
What does the outcome/verdict of the trial tell us about colonial juries and justice in the 13 colonies? They believe it was self defense. Everything was right, until there were too many shots fired. Describe the emotion of the crowd during the tar and feathering.
Is Captain Preston guilty?
Captain Preston was found not guilty. After his trial, Preston retired from the army. He reportedly settled in Ireland.
Who were the 5 colonists killed in the Boston Massacre?
The other soldiers began firing a moment later, and when the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead or dying—Crispus Attucks, Patrick Carr, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick and James Caldwell—and three more were injured.
How many bullets were fired in the Boston Massacre?
On March 5, 1770, British soldiers fired upon a group of rowdy colonists, killing five and wounding others.
Was the Boston massacre a massacre?
The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died. One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre.
When did the Boston Massacre happen?
March 5, 1770On March 5, 1770, after months of tensions due to occupation and taxation, Bostonians and Redcoats clashed in the streets of Boston.
How long did the Boston Massacre last?
The trial of Captain Preston started almost 8 month after the incident and lasted for one week, from October 24, 1770 to October 30, 1770. The second trial was for the soldiers. It started almost one month after Preston’s aquital, on November 27, 1770 and ended on Dec 14, 1770.
Why was the Boston Massacre The colonists fault?
The colonist were mad about the Stamp Act and were protesting. The King sent soldiers to go and maintain the colonist, this later ended up causing the boston massacre.The colonists are to blame because they were taunting the soldiers, throwing objects at the soldiers, and the colonist were upset with the stamp act.
How did the Boston Massacre lead to the American Revolution quizlet?
British soldiers fired into a crowd of colonists who were teasing and taunting them. Five colonists were killed. The colonists blamed the British and the Sons of Liberty and used this incident as an excuse to promote the Revolution.
