The protesters, who called themselves Patriots, were protesting the occupation of their city by British troops, who were sent to Boston in 1768 to enforce unpopular taxation measures passed by a British parliament that lacked American representation.
Contents
What were the British fighting for in the Boston Massacre?
More than 2,000 British soldiers occupied the city of 16,000 colonists and tried to enforce Britain’s tax laws, like the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts. American colonists rebelled against the taxes they found repressive, rallying around the cry, “no taxation without representation.”
What was the British point of view of the Boston Massacre?
Patriots argued the event was the massacre of civilians perpetrated by the British Army, while loyalists argued that it was an unfortunate accident, the result of self-defense of the British soldiers from a threatening and dangerous mob.
What was the intention of the Boston Massacre?
The purpose of the Boston Massacre was to try to make liberal and moderate people become radicals. It was really an accident and the radicals tried to use propaganda and turn something small into something big. The British soldiers were accused of Murder and manslaughter.
Why are the British to blame for the Boston Massacre?
This is what the British were doing to the colonists during the time of the Boston massacre. The Boston Massacre was a conflict that happened on March 5th 1770.A reason why the Boston Massacre was the fault of the British is because they killed the colonists by firing their weapons in the crowd of 30-40 colonists.
How did the British respond to the Boston Tea Party?
The British responded to the Boston Tea Party fiercely. They passed the Coercive Acts and the Quebec Act. Together, they became known in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts.
How many British soldiers were in the Boston Massacre?
eight British soldiers
Especially unpopular was an act that raised revenue through duties on lead, glass, paper, paint, and tea. On March 5, 1770, a crowd confronted eight British soldiers in the streets of the city. As the mob insulted and threatened them, the soldiers fired their muskets, killing five colonists.
What was the British perspective?
In fact, the prevailing attitude in Britain was that the colonies owed the nation for everything it had provided to them, including protection, economy, and supplies.They actually urged the government to acquiesce to the colonies’ demands rather than risk the severing of the economic relationship.
What did the British think about the battles of Lexington and Concord?
For the British, 73 were killed, 174 were wounded, and 26 were missing. While the colonists lost many minutemen, the Battles of Lexington and Concord were considered a major military victory and displayed to the British and King George III that unjust behavior would not be tolerated in America.
What famous patriot defended the British soldiers in their trial?
John Adams
John Adams and the Boston Massacre Trial of 1770 As noted in the 2008 HBO mini-series chronicling the life and career of John Adams (1735-1826), as a young lawyer the future president served as counsel for the defense in the trial of eight British soldiers accused of murder during a riot in Boston on March 5, 1770.
What was Revere main purpose in producing this piece?
What was Revere’s main purpose in producing this piece? Answer: Revere’s main purpose in creating this engraving was to show the rest of the colonies that the British are ruthless and they will do anything to keep up their nation.
What advantages did the British Empire have in the war against American independence?
Britain’s military was the best in the world. Their soldiers were well equipped, well disciplined, well paid, and well fed. The British navy dominated the seas. Funds were much more easily raised by the Empire than by the Continental Congress.
Did the British soldiers act in self defense during the events of the Boston Massacre?
Although the soldiers claimed to have acted in self-defense, patriot propaganda referred to the incident as the Boston Massacre. Eight British soldiers and their officer in charge, Captain Thomas Preston, faced charges for murdering five colonists.
Who was at fault for the Boston massacre the colonists or the British?
The British government was at fault for sending more soldiers to Boston. They should have known how much the colonists resented their presence in the colony. Yet the British continued to send soldiers there. They also sent very young, inexperienced, and brash soldiers to Boston.
Who is the most responsible for the Boston Massacre?
Ironically Tory Loyalist Samuel Quincy had the job of convicting the king’s men of murder, while Patriot John Adams led the effort to defend them. Amid continued mob activities and threats of lynching, Capt. Preston’s trial began on October 24, 1770. It lasted six days, an extremely long time then for a criminal trial.
How did the colonist react to British policies?
How did the colonists react to the new British policies? Colonists were angered by the policies. They thought that these laws violated their rights. They also thought that only colonial governments had the right to enforce taxes.
How did the British react to the Boston Tea Party quizlet?
The British responded to the Boston Tea Party by shutting down Boston Harbor. Shortly after that, Parliament passed several intolerable acts.
How do the British respond to the Boston Tea Party which act was the most drastic?
The most drastic of all was the Boston Port Act:closed the harbor until damages were paid and order could be ensured.
Why did the British pass the Tea Act?
On April 27, 1773, the British Parliament passes the Tea Act, a bill designed to save the faltering East India Company from bankruptcy by greatly lowering the tea tax it paid to the British government and, thus, granting it a de facto monopoly on the American tea trade.
Why did Adams defend British soldiers?
Without hesitation Adams agreed to defend the soldiers and their captain. Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.
Who defended the British soldiers in court?
John Adams
Although a devout patriot, John Adams agreed to risk his family’s livelihood and defend the British soldiers and their commander in a Boston courtroom. At stake was not just the fate of nine men, but the relationship between the motherland and her colonies on the eve of American Revolution.
